﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"><channel><title>HR Metrics</title><link>http://localhost/hrmetrics.org/stable/blog/</link><description>The Latest Blog Entries from HR Metrics</description><item><title>Welcome to the HR Metrics Blog.</title><author>(administrator)</author><description>Thank you for visiting the new HRMetrics.org Blog.  Featuring news, links and details about updates to our metrics or upcoming events.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The HR Metrics Performance Center has been modified to provide your organization with the information needed to support performance measurement.  Select a metric to display the usage, benefits, limitations and examples that will aid in more meaningful assessments.   &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One of our goals is to make this blog an interactive exchange for the HR community.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;About Our Blogger&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Tracy Ryan:&lt;br /&gt;Tracy, a life long Philadelphian, joined the HRMetrics team in 2007. She is currently working on a degree from The Pennsylvania State University. Her favorite function of HR is diversity. She feels that respecting and incorporating enriching variations into organizations will influence their overall success.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description><link>http://localhost/hrmetrics.org/stable/blog/details.aspx?entry=3</link><pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 11:22:30 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Simple, yet Valuable</title><author>(administrator)</author><description>HR metrics measure HR performance and HR performance may be divided into three over lapping categories:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The HR Function&lt;br /&gt;Group Performance&lt;br /&gt;Individual Performance &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Of these, individual performance is the most critical and the one that is responsible for the greatest frustrations, if not problems. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The simplest measure of individual performance, and yet of incredible and multiple value, is to at least annually collect simple performance and potential data on all employees.  If a simple 0 – 3 scale is used for each there is no basis for any employees to be missed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Performance&lt;br /&gt;0 – Very poor&lt;br /&gt;1 – Adequate&lt;br /&gt;2 – Good&lt;br /&gt;3 – Excellent&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Potential&lt;br /&gt;0 – None, terminate expeditiously&lt;br /&gt;1 – Do not consider for additional/great responsibilities&lt;br /&gt;2 – Capable of assuming additional/greater responsibilities with time/development&lt;br /&gt;3 – Capable of assuming additional/greater responsibilities now&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This simple system also fosters development and succession planning.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description><link>http://localhost/hrmetrics.org/stable/blog/details.aspx?entry=4</link><pubDate>Mon, 19 May 2008 15:50:50 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Is The Most Common always The Best</title><author>(administrator)</author><description>Ask your HR associates, “What is the most common HR metrics?”  (HR – not recruiting – cost per hire and time-to-fill are the most common recruiting metrics.  More on them later.)  Over three quarters of HR professionals will respond with the ratio of HR staff to total employment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And if you ask them “What is the least favorite HR metric and why?” over 80% reply “The ratio of HR staff to total employment – because it is unfair.”&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What does that tell you about HR metrics?&lt;br /&gt;</description><link>http://localhost/hrmetrics.org/stable/blog/details.aspx?entry=5</link><pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2008 17:38:33 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Ask HR Leaders</title><author>(administrator)</author><description>Q:  The CFO has casually noted several times, “I’d sure like to start seeing some reporting from HR.”  I’m just one of six HR directors reporting to a Senior Director HR.  What can I do – what should I do?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt;A:  You can and should lead the effort to start HR reporting.  Tell the Senior director you’re volunteering to do so:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To start, identify only about 10 “numbers” to report every month.  Here’s a sample ten:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Total HR Expenses/Total revenues&lt;br /&gt;Compensation budget variance&lt;br /&gt;Benefits budget variance&lt;br /&gt;New openings&lt;br /&gt;Filled positions&lt;br /&gt;Total open positions&lt;br /&gt;Recruiting efficiency/Recruiting cost ratio&lt;br /&gt;Average hiring manager satisfaction&lt;br /&gt;Positions open over target start date&lt;br /&gt;Average new  hire quality&lt;br /&gt;Critical HR issues (explain)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If the Senior Director hobbles the initiative let the CFO know, business needs trump any HR loyalty.  Invite feedback.  Once you start reporting, don’t stop.  Distribute the same format, day/date and time, overtime.  Let the CFO and other executives draw their own conclusions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description><link>http://localhost/hrmetrics.org/stable/blog/details.aspx?entry=6</link><pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 17:03:26 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Vendor Selection and Management</title><author>(administrator)</author><description>Q:    Provider or vendor selection and management is consistently  a top five priority of decision makers and it becomes increasingly critical as the economy tightens and organizations pay closer attention to spending.  How can I be sure I am making the right decisions?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A:    No one wants to be responsible for a bad selection.  Here are ten tips to help you make better purchasing decisions:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;1.  The more important the decision, the more important that it be based on performance. &lt;br /&gt;2.  The people who do the work are more important than the organization that employs them. &lt;br /&gt;3.  Establish your budget-spending parameters. &lt;br /&gt;4.  Define the range of requirements—from necessities to aspirations—and ascertain the differences. &lt;br /&gt;5.  Be honest about your buying time frame. &lt;br /&gt;6.  Be considerate of your sales professionals. They can offer a great deal of knowledge. &lt;br /&gt;7.  Work with organizations that reward superior performers and/or terminate poor performers &lt;br /&gt;8.  Some things are not negotiable, but you can always ask. &lt;br /&gt;9.  Poor purchasing decisions are never solely the seller’s fault. &lt;br /&gt;10.  No purchase can be a complete success without the commitment of the buyer. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Please tell us if you are interested in more detailed information.&lt;br /&gt;</description><link>http://localhost/hrmetrics.org/stable/blog/details.aspx?entry=7</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 14:58:05 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>IT is leading the way</title><author>(Administrator)</author><description>According to an article in this month’s CIO magazine, one of the major goals of an IT function during a merger or acquisition is to prove the value of IT to the organization. HR is in a constant state of trying to prove their value to the organization. There’s a lot HR can learn from IT on this front. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One of the major goals is proper planning. When merging to IT teams, a great deal of planning is required to make sure the business is running smoothly through the transition. Metrics require proper planning. If well planned, and executed, they can demonstrate a significant value to the C-suite. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Retention is also essential to the smooth transition. This is one piece that HR will understand without further explanation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Communication of expectations is another essential part of IT’s responsibilities during a merger. It’s also an essential part of HR’s responsibilities, especially the responsibilities of a recruiter when communicating with a hiring manager for things like time to start or the requirements of a position. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The point of all of this is simple, HR needs to build themselves a chair if they want to have a seat at the table and thanks to the efforts of other business functions, we’ve got all of the blueprints we need.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.cio.com/article/386013/How_CIOs_Can_Make_&lt;br /&gt;Mergers_Acquisitions_and_Divestitures_Work_for_Them</description><link>http://localhost/hrmetrics.org/stable/blog/details.aspx?entry=8</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:13:46 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>HR and the Country Music Industry</title><author>(Administrator)</author><description>I&amp;rsquo;m a fan of country music. I listen to it while I write most of the posts on this blog. Anastasia Brown has a new book out called "Make me a Star," which is all about the tricks and tips necessary to turn talent into performance when it comes to being a successful music entertainer. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is relevant to anyone in HR who has heard endless speeches about talent. Talent is an ability, and an amazing singing voice is certainly a marketable talent. However, that voice is nothing without the personality and charm to catch the eye of a scout. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Brown goes on to use her experience as a scout to bring essential feedback to prospective musicians, which can really be used by anyone trying to get their skills noticed. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For an HR professional, there are certain qualities you look for when you&amp;rsquo;re filling a given position. The combination of those qualities can make or break a new hire. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Check out the book here:&lt;br /&gt;http://www.kimbooks.org/IngramProduct.aspx?BN=9781401604042&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description><link>http://localhost/hrmetrics.org/stable/blog/details.aspx?entry=9</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 12:57:56 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title>Recruiting Cost Ratio</title><author>(Administrator)</author><description>The Staffing Institute recently released their first Index of Leading Staffing Indicators. Among the metrics in the report, recruiting cost ratio, is detailed in various forms. As a stand alone number, it probably doesn&amp;rsquo;t make much sense to most people. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A detailed definition can be found at:&lt;br /&gt;http://www.hrleaders.org/MetricsCenter.aspx?m=148&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The real meaning behind the metric is that the result you get, for example 14%, is the percentage of salary spent on recruiting expenses. So, if you&amp;rsquo;re planning to hire someone who will earn $100,000 per year, you can budget for $14,000 in expenses. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The national average this year is 14.96% across all industries. To learn more about this number, see the average for your industry, organization size or geographic region, you can find the Index of Leading Staffing Indicators at:&lt;br /&gt;http://www.staffinginstitute.org/Research-list.aspx&lt;br /&gt;</description><link>http://localhost/hrmetrics.org/stable/blog/details.aspx?entry=10</link><pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 14:49:17 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>